Thursday, May 23, 2019

No Lift Policy

The given scenario has provided a clear perspective to the slide down attitude and compliance ability of the nurses to the no come near form _or_ system of government of The Area of Health Services. The complaint has a certain gravity of issue to address but analyzing the situation further may lead to a definitive approach whether the nurses have really done the right thing or not. The no lift policy was designed to prevent and reduce nurses injuries when lifting or piteous patients (Morieson, 2000).As stated in the complaint of the proportional, Mrs. McDonald was forced to lift herself up in bed. This phrase may lead to a conclusion that the patient is actually capable of doing the act without any assistance from the nursing staff. She is at least aware of her capability to do a minimal procedure by herself. Although the impression service for a nurse is to provide assistance, there are some restrictions that are implemented to benefit both the staff and the patient. Apparen tly, there is a question on the nursing profession that provides a chance for the patients to be more independent.This will eventually permit the individual to carry his tasks for self fulfillment. The complaint in like manner stated that the two nurses were negligent of the patient. This may seem to be the case for the relative but the staff actually had the good attitude of complying with the regulations of the no lift policy. They have provided a rather complementary act by protecting their own health as well as giving opportunities for Mrs. McDonald to eventually lead up rehabilitating herself.As a matter of fact, if they had neglected the no lift policy just to satisfy the relatives impressions, they might have been subject to a very high risk of injury. This is one good example on how competent a nurse can be. A professional acts in accord with own competency level and recognized standards of enrolled nursing practice (ANMC).There is another consideration that should be re alized regarding the nurses manner in the situation. They have attempt to assist Mrs. McDonald in the around effective way by helping her climb up in bed without lifting her. The patient was able to receive sustainable assistance by guiding her body and gently holding her up to the correct position. This somehow shows that the nurses were still aware what was happening and that made them consider implementing the correct nursing practice enveloped in the nursing practice policy.In a bigger picture, the nurses did the most appropriate approach by not lifting Mrs. McDonald. They were just hobby a simple rule for the benefit of both parties involved, the patient and themselves. However, the submission of a complaint could have been avoided if there was a complete transparent intercourse between the nurse and the relative.As stated in the nurse code of ethics, the nurse has a responsibility to inform people about the nursing economic aid that is available to them, and people are en titled morally to accept or reject such care (ANMC, 1993). In this case, it would have been ideal to inform the relative about the no lift policy for mutual understanding. Moreover, the nurses should have at least questioned Mrs. McDonald if she actually is capable to lift herselfindependently. This affirmation may have provided a different perception on the side of the relative since it is the patients own judgment about her capability that is of great importance. The complete cooperation of Mrs. McDonald and the nurses should have been the most effective factor to avoid this kind of complaint scenario.ReferencesANMC. 1993. Code of Ethics for Nurses in Australia. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. Retrieved May 18, 2007 from http//www.anmc.org.au/docs/ANMC_Professional_Conduct.pdf.ANMC. National Competency Standards for the Enrolled Nurse. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. Retrieved May 18, 2007 from http//www.cshisc.com.au/docs/upload/ANMC%20competencies%20for%20the %20Enrolled%20Nurse.pdf.Morieson, B. 2000. Australian Nursing Federation. Retrieved May 18, 2007 from http//www.anfvic.asn.au/media_releases/010622.html.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.